This email from a Tulsa Resident arrived in my inbox this morning and I thought it was worth sharing.
I have been in the undecided
category on the "river tax" issue for the past few months, going back and forth between thinking the growth and development would be good for Tulsa and
also thinking that the money, however well intended, may not gain the
desired results.
Last night, I attended a
program, on all things, on pond and water conservation with a
presentation by the director of the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife. The gentleman is in charge of fish and water
development and offices in Jenks. Well, the conversation of course went to the
river issue.
This was a perspective I have
not read in the hundreds of flyers I have received at my home, nor in
the hundreds of commercials I have seen on television in the past three
weeks.
We will be taking one of the
only prairie rivers IN THE COUNTRY and destroying what nature
created for us. Yes, there are times
that there is no water in the river- that
is what the river naturally does. That
is the definition of a prairie river. He also mentioned that Tulsa is one of the few, if not only, cities you
can fish for massive fish in the city limits.
Most Tulsan don't realize
there is excellent fishing on the west bank of the Arkansas. Ask my husband, Bob. He can't believe the fish he and others have caught there. Striped bass 25 pounds and more.
Another important fact. If we create these "lakes", we will
destroy the striped bass population that
is now incredibly abundant in our own backyards. They cannot survive in the newly created
lakes due to their spawning activities.
And in addition, with the
silt and sand issue in a prairie river, within a relatively short period of
time, these lakes will fill with these materials and only be two or three feet
deep and have an unsafe water condition for any sort of activity to happen. He said Keystone Lake has the same issue happening right now. The techniques that were used to test for
water quality to promote the tax
are tests that are archaic and only used currently in two states. Oklahoma being one of them.
He tried very hard not to be
political with his comments, but it was very clear that this man is a
naturalist and loves the wildlife and the natural prairie river that has
existed long before we did. If the tax
passes, the ecosystem that has a delicate
balance will be destroyed- the fish, the flow of the river, and potentially
change into a stinking mess because of shallow, stagnant water.
The developments that exist
right now seem to be doing quite well without the river development- after
Bob and I attended the seminar, we went to Red Rock Grill and it was packed-
even with the river as it is.
And have you ever wondered
why you are being inundated with mailers (I receive up to two a day) and
television commercials? Who is paying
for all of this? And how does all this benefit downtown?
I only share this with you
because I have never read, or heard a true discussion on the natural
side of the development and think this message should be considered. I guess I will decide Tuesday in the voting
booth.
Diane Hambric
President
Gold Medallion Senior Housing
Recent Comments